Starfish Space (Autonomous Satellite Servicing) Dossier

Operating within the aerospace and defense sector, Starfish Space (Autonomous Satellite Servicing) generated an estimated annual revenue of $26,300,000 for the 2025 operating period. The organization reached this financial performance primarily through securing commercial and government contracts focused on satellite servicing, spacecraft life extension, and end-of-life disposal, a capability marketed as Deorbit-as-a-Service. Additionally, Starfish Space (Autonomous Satellite Servicing) recorded revenue inflows via Small Business Innovation Research funding and Defense Innovation Unit contracts to support ongoing spacecraft development and autonomous mission architecture.

Financial Highlights

* Estimated Annual Revenue (2025): $26,300,000

* Total Funding Raised: $162,000,000

* SDA Contract Value: $52,500,000

* USSF Follow-up Mission Contract Value: $54,500,000

* USSF Docking Demo Contract Value: $37,500,000

* NASA Inspection Contract Value: $15,000,000

* Total Employee Count: 93

Starfish Space (Autonomous Satellite Servicing) holds the third position among 15 active competitors in the autonomous spacecraft and on-orbit satellite servicing sector. The organization executes missions using a... Sign in / Sign up to learn more about Starfish Space Inc.

Continue your research by chatting with our AI financial analyst about Starfish Space Inc.. Ask follow-up questions, request specific analysis, or explore investment scenarios. All insights are grounded in verified financial data and SEC filings.

Start your analysis with these investor-focused questions:

• How does Starfish Space's estimated FY2025 annual revenue of $26.3 million reflect the execution of high-value government contracts, such as the $52.5 million Space Development Agency agreement, and what does this indicate about the financial scalability of Starfish Space's Deorbit-as-a-Service model?
• Starfish Space aims to provide Rendezvous and Proximity Operations at a fraction of traditional mission costs; how do proprietary technologies like the CEPHALOPOD software and Nautilus docking mechanism give Starfish Space a defensible economic moat against well-funded competitors like Astroscale?
• With the Otter Pup 2 LEO docking validation mission occurring in FY2025, how critical is the success of this specific technological milestone for Starfish Space to de-risk autonomous systems and accelerate the acquisition of commercial satellite operator clients?
• Considering the current lack of dedicated spectrum allocation for In-space Servicing, Assembly, and Manufacturing missions, how significantly could FCC and NTIA regulatory barriers impact Starfish Space's mission deployment timelines and overall investment risk profile?
• Given that Starfish Space currently relies heavily on U.S. defense budgets for early revenue generation, how does the dual-use capability of the Otter space tugs position Starfish Space to capitalize on growing geopolitical concerns in the contested space domain while simultaneously expanding into commercial markets?